Evidence

Published
when proven.

We hold our claims to the same standard hospitals hold their care. VitalSync is in clinical validation with Malaysian hospital partners, and this page will carry measured outcomes, with methodology, once that work clears review. Below is what we measure and why it matters.

Measurement Endpoints

The numbers we are
working to earn.

Alarm burden

Non-actionable alarms per patient per shift, before and with VitalSync. Published literature consistently reports that 80 to 99% of ICU alarms need no clinical action. Our target is a meaningful, measured reduction that never hides a real deterioration.

Status: baseline measurement in pilot

Lead time

How far ahead of conventional threshold alarms VitalSync flags deterioration. The model is built on a 6-hour prediction horizon; the pilot measures the warning time clinicians actually receive.

Status: in clinical validation

Precision

The share of VitalSync alerts that clinicians confirm as actionable. Alarm reduction is only safe if the alarms that remain can be trusted.

Status: in clinical validation

Sensitivity

The share of true deterioration events the system catches. This is the number we never trade away for quiet.

Status: in clinical validation

Our Commitment

Evidence first.
Marketing second.

๐Ÿ”ฌ

Validated Before Published

Every figure that appears on this page will come from measured hospital data or peer-reviewed study, with its methodology stated alongside it. Until a number clears that bar, it stays off this page.

๐Ÿฅ

Measured in Real Wards

Our validation runs inside Malaysian hospitals, on real monitoring workflows, alongside the clinicians who will use the system. Results will reflect practice, not simulation.

๐Ÿ“„

Peer Review as the Bar

Our clinical evidence programme targets peer-reviewed publication. When results are published, they will be linked here in full, including limitations.

๐Ÿ””

Safety Is Non-Negotiable

Alarm reduction is only reported together with sensitivity. A quieter ward that misses deteriorations is a failure, and our reporting will always show both sides of that trade.

Why It Matters

What solving alarm fatigue
is worth.

๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€โš•๏ธ

Staff Retention

Alarm fatigue is a leading driver of ICU nurse turnover. Reducing cognitive load and restoring clinical trust significantly improves nursing satisfaction and retention rates.

๐Ÿ˜ด

Reduced Patient Delirium

ICU noise is a documented delirium risk factor, and studies report alarm-related sleep disruption in around half of ICU patients. Delirium extends stays and raises costs.

โญ

Patient Satisfaction

Quieter wards, faster nurse response to genuine needs, and fewer unnecessary disturbances directly improve the patient and family experience of care.

๐Ÿ’ฐ

Cost Savings

Fewer adverse events, shorter ICU stays, reduced staff overtime from burnout, and lower delirium-related complications translate to measurable cost reduction per admission.

Next Step

The system is real today. See it.

The evidence programme is underway, and the platform it measures is already running. We will walk you through it on your ward size, device mix, and clinical context.